🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts about that comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is often helpless. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has made a several dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players winning major titles when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {